检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何柳[1,2] 董四平[1,2] 李萌[1] 郭淑岩[1]
机构地区:[1]卫生部医院管理研究所,北京100191 [2]武汉大学政治与公共管理学院,湖北武汉430072
出 处:《中国卫生政策研究》2014年第10期52-57,共6页Chinese Journal of Health Policy
摘 要:目的:了解医师多点执业相关研究进展,明确进一步研究方向。方法:检索中国知网、万方数据库、重庆维普数据库1949—2013年我国医师多点执业相关文献,分析密切相关文献数量,对被引频数不小于1次的文献进行内容分析。结果:从文献数量上看2009年之后医师多点执业相关研究明显增多,但很大程度上是中央政策引导的结果,研究相对政策推进存在一定滞后性;从文献内容上看现有研究存在缺乏对政策本身及配套政策分析、国际比较研究较少,相关法律问题不明确,多主体角度及实证研究不充分等不足。建议:加强多点执业政策本身及配套政策分析,注重医师执业制度国际比较研究,强化相关法律法规研究,开展相关利益主体多角度研究,重视以定量分析为基础的实证研究。Objectives:This study aims to summarize the research progress of multiple-site physician practice to determine further research directions. Methods:Literature on Chinese multiple-site physician practice between 1949 and 2013 was obtained from CNKI, Wan fang database and CQVIP database, the annual volume distribution of selected documents was been described and the topics and content of literature cited at least once were summarized through literature content analysis. Results:The volume of literature increased rapidly from 2009, guided by related government policies. Content analysis is insufficient in the research areas of supporting policies, international experiences, relevant laws and empirical studies. Suggestions: Further research should focus on multiple-site physician practice policies themselves and supporting policy analysis, international comparisons of multiple-site physician practice systems, studies into relevant laws and regulations and empirical studies based on quantitative methods.
分 类 号:R197[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4