动词和构式的关系——构式进路的利弊  

The relations between verbs and constructions:Advantages and disadvantages of the constructionist approach

作　　者：程琪龙[1] 程倩雯 

机构地区：[1]上海大学外国语学院 [2]英国班戈大学语言学及英语学院

出　　处：《当代语言学》2015年第1期35-46,125,共12页Contemporary Linguistics

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目("论元体现构式进路和词汇进路的互补研究"编号:11BYY112)中期成果

摘　　要：动词和结构之间的关系,长期以来一直是各种语言学理论关注和研究的重要课题。本文着重论证论元结构构式进路的利弊。本文通过举例论证指出,仅用Goldberg所提倡的动词和构式的整合关系,无法准确表述失配句和多配句,也无法解释错配句的动因。本文还证明,失配句的部分概念语义既不是由动词提供,也不是由构式提供,更谈不上压制。构式语法的这些遗留问题,可以由笔者构建的事件概念框架做出合理的形式表述。The relations between verbs and structures have been a hot topic in various linguistic theories.The paper focuses on the arguments for and against the constructionist approach.It is pointed out in this paper that the integration between verbs and constructions as proposed by Goldberg fails to accurately account for unmatched clauses and multi-matched clauses and fails to offer an explanation of the motivation of mismatched clauses.This paper also proves that parts of the conceptual semantics of unmatched clauses are provided neither by verbs nor by constructions.The remaining problems of Construction Grammar may be adequately solved by the event conceptual framework proposed by the authors.

关 键 词：构式语法 概念框架 动词和构式 整合 融合 

分 类 号：H314[语言文字—英语]