盐铁会议汉匈战和之争若干问题发微  

On Some Problems about the Debate on Han-Hun Relation at the Salt and Iron Meeting

作　　者：杨勇[1] 

机构地区：[1]郑州大学历史学院,郑州450001

出　　处：《中央民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第1期89-94,共6页Journal of Minzu University of China(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：盐铁会议对汉匈战和进行深入、全面辩论。桑弘羊运用"大九州说"为据主战,是一种突破传统的全新的地缘政治观;桑弘羊行刺单于说,开西汉后期行刺四夷首领平叛之先。文学不重视边地,反映其统一意识的滞后;担心统军将帅借攻匈奴分裂,又体现其统一意识的进步。贤良、文学三十八年后重启和亲主张,成为汉匈关系由战而和的转折点。At the Salt and Iron Meeting, an in-depth and comprehensive debate broke out on the relationship between Han and Hun. Sang Hongyang＇ s pro-war proposition, based on the theory of the wholeness of China, was a new geopolitical view; and his idea about assassinating the chiefs of Hun led to assassinations of ethnic chiefs in putting down rebellions in the late Western Han Dynasty. The virtuous literati on one hand neglected border areas, showing that they lacked the consciousness of unity; while on the other hand, they worried about the army generals who would split up the country by taking advantages of attacking the Huns, showing that they still had some consciousness of unity. 38 years later, the virtuous literati renewed their claim to make peace with the rulers of minorities in the border areas by marriage, which was the turning point from war to peace in Han-Hun relation.

关 键 词：盐铁会议 汉匈战和 桑弘羊 贤良 文学 

分 类 号：K01[历史地理—历史学]