检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国地质大学(武汉)公共管理学院 [2]中国土地勘测规划院,研究员北京100035
出 处:《中国行政管理》2015年第1期94-98,共5页Chinese Public Administration
基 金:教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目"征地听证制度运行绩效评价及其提升对策研究"(编号:12YJC630153)
摘 要:征地补偿和安置制度的界限长期以来一直模糊不清,导致征地矛盾频发和制度改革受阻。征地补偿和安置的关系经历了从并列,到安置优先,再到补偿优先的变化。征地补偿和安置在理论基础、目的、原则、主体、对象、形式、参照标准和纠纷调处八个方面都有明显区别,对两者的辨析具有三点政策启示:制定土地征收法,明晰补偿与安置的制度差异;明晰权责利关系,重新调整征地安置的实施主体;多元并举,提高征地安置的可持续性。The boundary between compensation and resettlement institutions of land expropriation in China is fuzzy, which leads to frequent land expropriation disputes and hinders the institutional reformation. The relationship of compensation and resettlement ean be divided into three stages, the equal stage, the compensation-priority stage, and the resettlement-priority stage. The differences between compensation and resettlement institutions lay in the basic theory, the purpose, the principle, the subject and object, the form, the reference standard, and the dispute mediation. Three policy inspirations include: the legislation of land expropriation law which should distinguish the two institutions clearly, the re-adjustment of implement subject, and the promotion of the sustainability of land expropriation resettlement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.87