检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蔡鹤[1]
出 处:《四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第1期21-28,共8页Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目"中国刑法语境下法条竞合论的建构研究"(12BFX056)的阶段性成果
摘 要:价值判断是刑法解释的核心问题,价值判断的主体性导致价值判断的复杂性,刑法中的价值判断由于其特殊性更加难以把握。但价值的客观性使刑法解释具有确定性,使罪刑法定原则具有实现的可能。受现代刑法价值理念和价值判断特性的双重制约,刑法解释应持客观解释论,解释过程应从正义观念、法条文义的最大可能范围和国民预测可能性三个维度进行,最后借助于程序正当性解决通过前述三个维度仍无定论的问题。Value judgment is the major issue in the interpretation of criminal law. Its complexity de-rives from its subjectivity. With its particularity, value judgment in the interpretation of criminal law be-comes even harder. Nevertheless, the objectivity of value leaves the interpretation of criminal law with certainty and principle of legality with possibility. Restricted by both modern criminal law and value judg-ment particularity, the interpretation of criminal law should be objective, with interpreting course from three dimensions, i.e., conception of justice, the largest extent of literal content of law, and the forecast for the possibility of nationals. Procedural legitimacy will be applied to those issues beyond those three di-mensions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.138.137.25