检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆第三军医大学大坪医院,重庆市400042 [2]北京大学人民医院
出 处:《中国全科医学》2014年第32期3878-3879,共2页Chinese General Practice
摘 要:目的探讨食管电极导管的使用次数与食管调搏起搏电压阈值的关系。方法选取2012—2013年在重庆第三军医大学大坪医院行食管调搏检查的患者123例,比较采用新导管或曾使用过1-2次(A组)、3-4次(B组)、4次以上(C组)食管电极导管患者的起搏电压阈值。结果 A组患者的起搏电压阈值为(13.07±2.63)V,B组患者的起搏电压阈值为(17.15±2.60)V,C组患者的起搏电压阈值为(21.65±1.89)V,3组患者的起搏电压阈值间差异有统计学意义(F=147.019,P〈0.05);其中B组起搏电压阈值高于A组,C组起搏电压阈值高于A、B组,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论食管电极导管重复使用3-4次以上时因电极表面钝化膜的形成导致起搏电压阈值增高,阻碍了该项技术在临床的推广与使用。Objective To explore the relationship between the frequency of use of esophageal electrode catheter and transesophageal cardiac electrophysiology pacing threshold voltage. Methods A total of 123 patients who had esophageal pacing check during 2012- 2013 in Daping Hospital were enrolled in this study. This study compared the pacing thresholds in groups A( having used for 1-2 times),B( having used for 3-4 times),C( having used for more than 4 times). Results The average pacing threshold voltage was( 13. 07 ± 2. 63) V in group A,( 17. 15 ± 2. 60) V in group B,( 21. 65 ± 1. 89) V in group C. The difference was significant( F = 147. 019,P 〈0. 05); and group B was higher than group A,group C was higher than group A,B( P 〈0. 05). Conclusion Esophageal electrode catheter will lead to the increase of pacing threshold due to passivation coating of surface of the electrode when it using for more than 3- 4 times,which hinders its promotion and use in clinical practice.
分 类 号:R541.78[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.178.2