学术论文中的学术失范、学术不端现象及其防范  被引量:2

Study on Academic Faults and Dishonesty in Academic Papers and Its Prevention

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:仇慧[1] 崔洁[1] 

机构地区:[1]南通大学杂志社,江苏南通226019

出  处:《廉政文化研究》2014年第5期46-51,共6页Anti-corruption and Integrity Culture Studies

基  金:南通大学人文社会科学基金项目(12W12;13W06)

摘  要:目前辨别及防范学术失范和学术不端行为已成为学术期刊出版的一项重要工作。选取某学术期刊,对其来稿情况及利用《学术不端行为检测系统》比对的结果进行分析。结果表明,作者来稿中的学术失范和学术不端行为的产生既有主观原因又有客观因素,涉及到作者的学术态度、写作动机,对学术道德的认识,对引文标注、著作权法等相关规范和法律条文的理解,以及对网络媒体和纸质期刊之间关系的了解等各个方面。学术期刊的编辑,是学术论文发表的审核者和把关者,应该利用好《学术不端行为检测系统》,辩证地分析检测结果,提高辨别和防范学术失范及学术不端行为的能力,尽最大可能避免重复发表和剽窃之作流向社会。Discerning and preventing the behavior of academic faults and dishonesty have become an important task for the publication of academic periodicals. On the basis of a certain academic journal, the paper analyzes its manuscripts and the comparing results by using "Academic Misconduct Literature Check"(AMLC). The research shows that the behaviors of academic faults and dishonesty result from both subjective and objective factors, which include authors' academic attitude, writing motion, knowledge of the Copyright Law and relative stipulations and standards, and the understanding of the relation between internet media and paper journals. As first checkers on the process of paper publication, editors need to make full use of AMLC, dialectically analyze the comparing results of AMLC and promote their own ability of discerning and preventing in order to avoid the publication of dishonest and plagiarized papers to the greatest extent.

关 键 词:学术失范 学术不端 学术道德 编辑视角 

分 类 号:D923.41[政治法律—民商法学] G238[政治法律—法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象