尿毒净液与肾康注射液治疗慢性肾衰竭的比较研究  

A Comparative Study of Urea Nitrogen Cleaning Fluid and ShenKang Injection in Treating Chronic Renal Failure

作　　者：肖烈钢[1] 何本夫[1] 朱成全[1] 

机构地区：[1]解放军第421医院,广东广州510318

出　　处：《西部中医药》2014年第10期84-85,共2页Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine

基　　金：全军医学科学技术研究"十一五"计划课题(编号06MA124)

摘　　要：目的:比较尿毒净液与肾康注射液治疗慢性肾衰竭(CRF)的临床疗效。方法:选取52例CRF患者随机分为对照组和观察组各26例,对照组在西医治疗基础上加用肾康注射液治疗,观察组在西医治疗基础上加用尿毒净液治疗,观察比较2组疗效。结果:观察组和对照组的总有效率分别为84.62%和80.77%(χ2=10.50,P>0.05)。治疗后2组内生肌酐清除率(CCr)、血尿素氮(BUN)和血肌酐(SCr)水平相似(P>0.05),均较治疗前显著改善(P<0.05)。结论:尿毒净液治疗CRF的临床疗效与肾康注射液相当。Objective：To compare clinical effects of urea nitrogen cleaning fluid and ShenKang injection in treating chronic renal failure （CRF）. Methods：Fifty-two CRF patients were randomized into the control group and the observation group, the control group were given with ShenKang injection on the foundation of western medicine and the observatioin group urea nitrogen cleaning fluid, curative effects of both groups were observed and compared. Results：Total effective rates of the observation group and the control group were 84.62%and 80.77%respectively （χ^2=10.50, P〉0.05）. Endogenous creatinine clearance （CCr）, the levels of blood urea nitrogen （BUN） and serum creatinine （SCr） of both groups were similar after treating （P〉0.05）, they were improved significantly compared with before treating （P〈0.05）. Conclusion：Urea nitrogen cleaning fluid shows similar effects to ShenKang Injection in the treatment for CRF.

关 键 词：肾衰竭 慢性 尿毒净液 肾康注射液 

分 类 号：R692.5[医药卫生—泌尿科学]