检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:随新民[1]
机构地区:[1]中原工学院政法学院
出 处:《南亚研究》2014年第4期1-15,153,共15页South Asian Studies
基 金:河南省高校创新人才支持计划和社科规划基金(项目编号2013-GH-128)的资助
摘 要:中印在边境地区的互动是一个动态博弈过程。表征相同或近似的边境情境实则蕴含着不同的策略均衡,即从"鹰—鸽"纯策略均衡到威慑下的"一报还一报"混合均衡,再回归到准协调机制下的纯策略相关均衡。中印边界博弈的"外溢效应"明显,并抑制了边境紧张或危机的扩散升级。中国和印度在边界认知上的巨大反差、互信赤字、国内政治影响决定了边界纠纷难以在可预期的中近期内妥善解决,武装共处下的和平并伴有可控的、低烈度的局部危机将是中印边境地区的常态。延展到全方位中印关系领域,非合作博弈下的竞争性合作将是双边关系的基本特征。Interactions between China and India in their border region can be conceived of as a highly dynamic theoretical game. Seemingly identical or similar scenarios with respect to the border actually represent different strategic equilibria. These include a dove- hawk pure strategy equilibrium,a tit- for- tat mixed strategy equilibrium,and a coordination mechanism induced pure strategy relative equilibrium. A 'spillover effect'is clearly evident in the China- India border game,which serves to contain tensions or prevent a crisis from escalating. Collectively,the major contrast in understanding between China and India vis- à- vis the border situation,trust deficit and the impact of domestic politics make it extremely difficult for India and China to satisfactorily resolve the border dispute in the foreseeable future. With a militarized presence on both sides,peace can be managed,China- India relations will continue to be characterized by competitive cooperation within the context of a non- cooperative game.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30