检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭慧平[1] 卢晓欣[1] 汤永建[1] 房卫红[1] 韩丹[1] 田君[1]
机构地区:[1]南京军区福州总医院高压氧科,福州350025
出 处:《海军医学杂志》2014年第6期452-453,515,共3页Journal of Navy Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨氧与药物联合应用治疗颅脑外伤后头痛的效果。方法对2010年4月至2012年3月共105例颅脑损伤后头痛患者进行氧与药物联合应用的对照研究。经患者知情同意,医院伦理委员会批准,将105例患者分为3组:高压氧组(42例),舱外高流量氧组(36例)和对照组(27例)。以疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)作为头痛治疗效果评价方法。3组患者均进行常规药物治疗,即应用改善微循环、营养神经、镇痛等药物,高压氧组加用高压氧治疗,舱外高流量组加用舱外高流量氧治疗(常压氧)。结果治疗2个疗程后高压氧组、舱外高流量氧组、对照组的VAS评分别为(1.24±1.63)、(3.21±2.12)、(4.13±1.42)分;头痛次数为(1.67±0.62)、(3.87±1.29)、(4.28±0.75)次/周、头痛持续时间分别为(1.48±0.87)、(2.52±0.92)、(4.37±0.96)h。各组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。3组患者中高压氧组治愈率最高,舱外高流量氧组效果次之,前2组疗效均优于对照组,各组之间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对颅脑创伤后头痛患者,联合应用氧与药物治疗是既有效又安全的治疗方案。Objective To explore the effects of oxygen coupled with drug therapy in the treatment of headache following trau -matic brain injury.Methods A comparative study was made on 105 cases of headache induced by traumatic brain injury treated with hyperbaric oxygen ( HBO) coupled with drug therapy from April 2010 to March 2012.The patients were divided into 3 groups:the HBO group (42 cases), the outside chamber high-flow oxygen group (36 cases) and the control group (27 cases).The pain visual analog scores ( VAS) were used as a pain assessment method for the treatment efficacy of headache .The patients of 3 groups were all given routine drug treatment , for improvement of microcirculation , nutrition of neural cells and analgesia .The patients in the HBO and the outside chamber high-flow oxygen groups were respectively supplemented with HBO therapy and high-flow oxygen therapy .Results Af-ter two treatment courses , VAS scores for the HBO group , the outside chamber high-flow oxygen group and the control group were re-spectively (1.24 ±1.63),(3.21 ±2.12)and(4.13 ±1.42).The number of headache for the 3 groups were respectively(1.67 ± 0.62)times/week,(3.87 ±1.29)times/week and(4.28 ±0.75)times/week.And the durations of headache were respectively (1.48 ± 0.87)h,(2.52 ±0.92)h and(4.37 ±0.96) h.Statistical significance could be noted , when comparisons were made between the 3 groups (P〈0.05).Results indicated that cure rate of the HBO group was the highest , the outside chamber high-flow oxygen group came the second , which were all superior to that of the control group , and statistical difference could be seen , when comparisons were made between the groups(P〈0.05).Conclusion For patients with headache following traumatic brain injury , the combined treatment with oxygen and drugs was a safe and effective treatment method .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222