检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:峗怡[1]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学政治与公共事务管理学院,重庆401120
出 处:《中国卫生政策研究》2014年第11期24-29,共6页Chinese Journal of Health Policy
基 金:国家社科基金青年项目(13CZX082)
摘 要:卫生资源优先次序分配作为政府有效治理的重要领域,在我国仍缺乏类似层面的综合思考。西方在该领域的研究趋势已从单纯的经济学思考走向了政治经济学、制度约束、卫生筹资的全面分析,并在更宏大的组织和政治情境中,考量政府的治理范围、手段,建构操作性强的优先次序分配框架。在卫生决策实践中,找寻跨学科工具的最佳组合考验着决策者的治理水平。本文梳理政治学、卫生经济学、哲学、法学、循证医学等不同学科对卫生资源优先次序分配的思考。最后明确政府卫生资源治理的层次、治理策略建议,强调卫生决策从"作为结构的治理"走向"作为过程的治理"的发展规律因应我国所面临的挑战。Priority setting of health resource allocation depends on effective and comprehensive governmentbased stewardship,the national research of which lacks comprehensive considerations. The paper articulates the trend of western research from solo economic analysis to a combined comprehension of political economies,systemic constraints and health financing,to consider the scope,strategy and enforced framework for government rationing within a larger organizational and political context. In the health decision-making practice,the best formula for interdisciplinary tools is a test of stewardship capacity. A multi-disciplinary approach from the perspectives of politics,health economies,philosophy,law and evidence-based medicine must be adopted for the priority setting of health resource allocation. Finally,a clear stewardship phased objective is proposed as well as strategies,with emphasis on health decisions from "stewardship as structure"to "stewardship as a process"with challenges that lie ahead.
分 类 号:R197[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117