检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:司枫
机构地区:[1]江苏省沛县人民医院骨科,江苏沛县221600
出 处:《实用骨科杂志》2014年第12期1076-1078,共3页Journal of Practical Orthopaedics
摘 要:目的比较人工股骨头置换术与股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail antirotation,PFNA)治疗高龄Evans Ic型股骨粗隆间骨折患者的临床效果。方法 2010年1月至2012年7月间,我院共收治45例高龄Evans Ic型股骨粗隆间骨折患者,按照治疗方法分为PFNA组与人工股骨头置换手术组,其中PFNA组21例,人工股骨头置换组24例。术后将两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后负重时间、术后并发症发生率以及术后3个月、12个月患髋Harris评分进行对比分析。结果有43例患者得到随访,2例失访,平均随访时间16.1个月。PFNA内固定失败患者3例,后改用人工股骨头置换术治疗。在手术时间、术中出血量方面,PFNA组低于关节置换组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后早期下床时间及术后3个月髋关节Harris评分方面人工股骨头置换组优于PFNA组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组间术后1年髋关节Harris评分以及术后并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对于高龄Evans Ic型股骨粗隆间骨折应首选PFNA固定,但对于严重骨质疏松或内固定失败患者应采用人工股骨头置换术。Objective To compare treatment effects between artificial femoral head replacement and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA) in the elderly Evans type Ic femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Methods From January 2010 to July 2012 ,there were 48 elderly patients who had suffered from Evans type Ic femoral intertrochanteric fractures,which were retro- spectively analyzed based on operative management. PFNA for 21 cases and artificial femoral head replacement for 24 cases. The clinical results of the 2 groups were documented and compared in the followed aspects : operation time, blood loss during operation,load bearing time,incidence rates of complications and the Harris hip score of 3 and 12 months after operation. Re- suits There were 43 patients got follow-up,2 cases were lost,with average follow-up time was 16.1 months. There were 3 pa- tients who failed with PFNA internal fixation were treated with artificial femoral head replacement. Follow-ups showed that PF- NA group was superior to artificial femoral head replacement group in the operation duration and the blood loss during operation (P 〈0.05) ,and inferior to artificial femoral head replacement group in the load bearing time and the Harris hip score at the time 3 months after operation ( P 〈 0.05 ), There were no significant difference in the incidence rates of complications and the Harris hip score at the time 12 months between two groups ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion PFNA can be preferred to apply in the elderly Evans Ic femoral intertrochanteric fractures, but to severe osteoporosis or internal fixation failure, the artificial femoral head replacement is better.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.156