回指的主题重构功能  

On the Topic Reconstruction Function of Anaphora

作　　者：王军[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学外国语学院,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《山东外语教学》2014年第6期29-34,共6页Shandong Foreign Language Teaching

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"基于概念匹配;释义与连通的衔接功能语用研究"(项目编号:13BYY149);江苏省社科基金项目"模糊照应的功能认知研究"(项目编号:12YYB004)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：传统的回指研究一般视同指为一必要的条件,在回指语和先行语关系方面更加注重先行语的主题性与可及性特征,基本不涉及回指语的主题性问题。但Dahl&Hellman(1995)把回指视作一个动态操作过程,强调异指的普遍性,认为回指语具有构建新主题的功能。基于这一基本的思想,本文进一步分析了最为普通的直接回指和间接回指,发现回指语的主题重构功能不仅仅存在于"情境指称"(situation reference)以及特殊的直接回指之中,事实上,凡是涉及时间变化的直接回指以及间接回指都在回指语上表现出主题重构的特征,这一分析才是对"同指关系应该被视作一种特例"(Dahl&Hellman,1995:79)的最好证明。Coreference has long and widely been regarded as a necessary attribute in the study of anaphora, and considerable emphasis has been placed on the topicality and accessibility of antecedent, with no mention of the topicality of anaphor. Dahl ＆ Hellman （ 1995）, however, treat anaphora as a process of dynamic operation, stressing the universality of inconsistent reference, and the function of structuring new topics on the part of anaphor. In light of this idea, this paper explores the most frequently studied direct anaphora and indirect anaphora, and finds that topic-reconstruction not only exists in the so-called ＂situation reference＂ and some special indirect anaphora, but also in the direct anaphora and indirect anaphora where chronological change is involved. This is a further proof to demonstrate the proposition that ＂（c） oreference may . . . be regarded as a special case＂ （ Dahl ＆ Hellman, 1995 ： 79）.

关 键 词：回指 同指 主题重构 动态操作 

分 类 号：H03[语言文字—语言学]