检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中航工业第一飞机设计研究院,西安710089 [2]西北工业大学材料学院,西安710072
出 处:《塑性工程学报》2014年第6期26-30,共5页Journal of Plasticity Engineering
摘 要:采用弹塑性有限元法对TC21钛合金耳片衬套挤压和芯棒挤压过程进行仿真模拟,对比分析经两种工艺挤压后孔周边的残余应力分布规律;结合未经孔挤压强化和经两种不同孔挤压工艺强化的耳片疲劳实验结果,对两种不同孔挤压工艺的强化效果进行了分析。结果表明,挤压后孔边残余应力沿径向、周向和厚度方向的分布都呈现一定的变化规律,且芯棒挤压后的残余应力分布比衬套挤压更均匀,两种挤压方式都能起到强化效果,但芯棒挤压的强化效果更好。Mandrel cold expansion and split‐sleeve expansion of TC21 titanium alloy lugs were simulated by elastic‐plastic finite el‐ement method .Based on the simulation results ,the residual stress distributions around the hole were analyzed .Combining the fa‐tigue experiments of lugs after mandrel cold expansion and split‐sleeve expansion ,the strengthening effects of the two processes were evaluated .Results show that the residual stress distributions along the direction of radial ,circumferential and thickness have some changes .The distribution of the residual stress after mandrel cold expansion is more uniform than that after split‐sleeve ex‐pansion .Both the two kinds of processes can strengthen the holes ,while the effect of mandrel cold expansion is much better .
分 类 号:TG316[金属学及工艺—金属压力加工]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15