检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李高宁[1]
出 处:《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》2014年第3期47-50,共4页Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
摘 要:在食品安全令人忧心忡忡的社会现实下,"量刑反制"的思路悄然而生,具体表现为在区分生产、销售有毒有害食品罪与生产、销售伪劣产品罪区分的过程中对"明知"的主观内容进行曲解。在与生产、销售不符合卫生标准的食品罪的区分过程中,由于添加物质的标准不够明晰,也导致了罪刑关系的确定性被损害,甚至有毒有害食品犯罪的关联行为被适当地确定为以危险方法危害公共安全罪。目前我国司法实践中对生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪的基本犯罪的处罚较轻是符合实际的,但对于结果和情节加重犯应当慎用死刑。Under the social reality of care-laden food security,"sentencing counter" arises spontaneously,it is represented as the misconstruction of subjective content of "know perfectly well" in the process of distinguishing the differences between crime of manufacturing or selling poisonous foods and crime of manufacturing or selling fake and inferior products. In the process of distinguishing the differences between crime of manufacturing or selling foodstuffs not qualified for hygiene standards,due to the standards of additions are not clear,it results the definiteness of crime and punishment is not clear,and even the association behavior manufacturing or selling poisonous and harmful food is properly determined to crime of endangering public security by dangerous methods. At present,the light punishment for the crime of manufacturing or selling poisonous and harmful foods in our country’s judicial practice is realistic,but death penalty for crime with aggravated circumstances and results should be used with caution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7