检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵正东[1] 黄应福[2] 景惠荣[1] 樊哲[3] 田晓峰[1] 罗福文[1]
机构地区:[1]大连医科大学附属第二医院普外科,辽宁大连116023 [2]福建医科大学附属泉州第一医院泌尿外科,福建泉州362000 [3]大连医科大学附属大连市第三人民医院,辽宁大连116000
出 处:《医学与哲学(B)》2014年第12期28-30,49,共4页Medicine & Philosophy(B)
摘 要:比较大隐静脉腔内激光疗法(EVLT)联合高位结扎术与传统术式的临床疗效。选取大连医科大学附属第二医院2008年2月~2014年2月收治的大隐静脉曲张患者180例,采用EVLT的90例患者为激光组,采用传统高位结扎剥脱治疗的90例患者为对照组。激光组患者手术时间,切口数目及出血量优于对照组(P〈0.05);两组总体VCSS计分差值、CEAP分布改变无差异,但伴静脉性溃疡病例,激光组VCSS计分差值优于传统组(P〈0.05);两组术后并发症无差异。EVLT联合高位结扎术综合疗效明显优于传统术式,伴有静脉性溃疡的病例尤其明显。To explore the clinical significance between traditional surgical ligation combined with stripping and EVLT combined with high ligation on treatment of great saphenous varicosis vein,180 cases of simple great saphenous varicosis vein treated in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from February 2008 to February 2014 were employed and 90 cases accepted EVLT combined with high ligation as the observation group,other 90 cases as control group.The results were as follows:the operation time,bleeding volume and the incision number is lesser in EVLT group than that in control group(P〈0.05);no significance of VCSS and CEAP were observed in different groups.Nevertheless,in patients who were combined with venous ulcer,the VCSS is decreased in EVLT group than in control group(P〈0.05)no significance of complications were observed between the two groups.We concluded that the clinical efficacy of EVLT combined with high ligation was significantly more effective than traditional surgery especially in the cases associated with venous leg ulcer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62