检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭兴利[1]
机构地区:[1]淮阴师范学院政治与公共管理学院,江苏淮安223001
出 处:《华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第1期88-95,共8页Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家社科基金项目"包容性增长中的不平等及其法律应对研究"(14BFX139);淮阴师范学院高级别科研项目培育基金
摘 要:森认为现代社会几种典型的平等理论——功利主义的效用平等观、罗尔斯的基本善平等观、诺齐克的权利平等观、德沃金的资源平等观——均存有对不平等的遮蔽之不足。森通过"能力评价体系",说明不平等实质上是个体的不同等的实现美好生活的能力,其内容主要包含"生活内容"、"能力"与"自由"等范畴。我们认为,森的能力不平等观的重大现实价值在于其将有利于人们用更宽广的视野来认识不平等问题,并要求政府行为与公共政策不再仅仅以增加个体收入为中心,促使人们更加认识到参与是发展的重要目标。Amartya Sen holds that there exists the deficiency of covering up inequality in several typical equality theories of modern society—— the utilitarianism'equality of effectiveness,Rawls' s equality of primary goods,Nozick's equality of rights,and Dworkin's equality of resources. With "evaluation system",Amartya Sen proposes that inequality,in essence,is the inequality of individual's capability of achieving a good life,including "living activities","capability"and "freedom". We believe that Amartya Sen's inequality of capability bears significant practical values because it favors people to understand inequality from a broader perspective,demands that act of government and public policy should no longer just center on increasing the individual income and impels people to realize that participating is the important goal of developing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.198