检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐磊[1,2]
机构地区:[1]美国加州大学戴维斯分校,美国加州戴维斯95616 [2]中国政法大学刑事法学院,北京100088
出 处:《西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年第1期75-84,共10页Journal of Northwest University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基 金:国家社科基金项目(09CFX062)
摘 要:我国有证搜查还处于内部控制、自我约束和事后监督的阶段。被搜查者的合法权利不得不严重依赖于侦查人员搜查的文明程度。而无证搜查立法的拘谨与侦查实践的现实需要之间存在显著的差异。我国搜查措施所存在的问题,显示出搜查措施对侦查机关的规范和约束力度还处于较低的水平,对被搜查者权利的保障仍有所不足。我国不仅需要完善有证搜查制度,而且更需要建立和规范以同意搜查为核心的无证搜查制度,以追随刑事诉讼现代化之步伐,实现法治中国之梦想。Search with warrant is in the stage of internal control,self - discipline and subsequent supervision in Chinese criminal practices. The legitimate rights of the being searched are forced to rely heavily on the investi- gators. And there are significant differences between the legislation of warrantless search and the investigative practices. The problems of search show that measures to regulate and restrain investigation are still at a low level ,and the rights of the being searched are short of enough protection. China needs not only to improve the search with warrant system,but also to establish and regulate the warrantless search system,in order to follow the pace of modernization of criminal procedure law and realize of the dream of the rule of law in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15