检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高岚君[1]
出 处:《辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年第1期118-124,161,共7页Journal of Liaoning University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目"辽宁对朝鲜投资新模式的国际法问题研究"(L11BFX008);辽宁大学国家级项目预申报基金"海外利益保护与不干涉内政原则的守与变"(2010LDGY12)的前期研究成果
摘 要:传统战争法中没有规定国家的战争赔偿责任或者其他责任,战败国向战胜国以赔偿方式承担战争责任是当时国际社会公认的习惯法规则之一。目前,国家承担战争赔偿责任的法律依据主要包括国际习惯、国际条约、国际组织决议和联合国国际法委员会二读通过的国家责任条款草案以及国内立法。现代战争高科技特质与国际法人本化趋势的相遇与契合,是国家战争赔偿责任发生转变的动因,国家战争赔偿责任目前正在悄悄地发生着重大转变,具有更高正义性的赔偿制度的产生成为可期待的目标。There was no rule on state responsibility of war reparation or others in traditional law of war. It was known as a rule of customary law in international society at that time that vanquished countries should compensate for victorious countries. Now the legal sources that a state pay for the war damages include mainly international customs, international treaties, resolutions of international organization, second reading The United Nations International Law Commission's Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrong Acts and internal legislations. The meet of high-technology characteristics of modern warfare and the trends towards humanization in international law is the reason that state responsibility of war reparation is changing. At present the state responsibility of war reparation is changing significantly and quietly. We would find a war reparation system with more justice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229