宪法在司法实践中的适用——以人身自由私法保护为例  

Application of the Constitution in juridical practice:A case study of the private legal protection of personal freedom

作　　者：梁成意[1] 周佳[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东交通大学人文学院,江西南昌330013

出　　处：《云南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第1期82-90,共9页Journal of Yunnan Normal University：Humanities and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"民法的宪法维度与宪法的民法适用研究"(11CFX014)阶段性成果

摘　　要：宪法中的人身自由既是公法上的权利,也是私法上的权利。作为私法上的权利,我国民事立法对人身自由并无具体规定。在司法实践中,法官将人身自由转化为人格尊严,再将人格尊严转化为名誉权,并通过名誉权实现人身自由的法律保护。这一过程体现了法官的规范思维、整体思维和实用思维。为减少解释,最大限度地尊重成文法,法官有时在裁判文书中援引(相对于法律而言)更为具体的宪法条文。当宪法条文成为裁判规范任一构成要素的组成部分时,宪法就被司法适用了。Personal freedom in the Constitution is not only a right in the public law,but also one in the private law.However,the latter is unclear in the civil legislation of China.In judicatory practice, the judge transforms personal freedom to human dignity,then transforms human dignity to the right of reputation through which the legal protection of personal freedom can be finally realized.This process is a reflection of the judge＇s normative thinking,overall thinking and pragmatic thinking. Sometimes the judge invokes more concrete constitutional articles in the juridical document,in order to reduce explanation and adequately respect the statute law.When one constitutional article becomes a factor of adjudicative norms,the Constitution is implemented by the judge.

关 键 词：人身自由 私法保护 法官逻辑 宪法适用 条件 

分 类 号：D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]