检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李仲平[1]
出 处:《国际经贸探索》2015年第1期101-114,共14页International Economics and Trade Research
基 金:2012年国家社科基金一般项目(12BFX139);上海财经大学2012研究生创新基金资助项目(CXJJ-2012-307)
摘 要:利益接受者概念的提出及与补贴获得者的分裂,为逆向回溯上游补贴利益传递分析的法律依据提供了基点和场域。由于在SCM协定第五部分(反补贴措施)中不可或缺的利益传递分析,在SCM协定第三部分(可诉性补贴)中仅是判断严重侵害因果关联的考虑要素之一,并在SCM协定第二部分(禁止性补贴)中几无必要,WTO框架下实施利益传递分析的法律依据,是与SCM协定第五部分紧密相关的GATT1994第6条第3款及其派生条款。The raising of benefit recipient concept and the dividing of subsidy winners provide the legal basis and field for reversing back the legal basis for the benefit pass- through analysis of upstream subsidy. Due to the fact that the indispensable benefit pass- through analysis in Part V of SCM Agreement (countervailing measures) is only one of the major factors for the causal relation of serious prejudice in Part III of SCM Agreement (actionable subsidies), and is almost unnecessary in Part II of SCM Agreement (prohibitive subsidies), the legal basis for the benefit pass-through analysis under SCM Agreement is Article VI:3 GATT 1994 and its derivative rules.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.56