检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《林业经济》2014年第12期37-42,89,共7页Forestry Economics
基 金:林业公益性行业科研专项课题"林改后南方林地可持续高效经营关键技术研究与集成示范"(编号:201004008)
摘 要:基于全国林改试验区福建省三明市462户农户的调查数据,利用单因素方差分析模型,实证分析了林改后农户不同林业经营模式下对林改的满意度差异,探究了其差异产生的原因。研究发现,林农对林改的认同受到不同经营模式的影响:在0.1的显著性水平上,林农对林改满意度排序为"村集体经营、村小组集体经营<单户经营<联户经营"。最后从产权角度对影响不同经营模式下林农对林改认同差异的原因进行探讨。Collective forest tenure reform allows individual farmers to have the contract for collective forest land by institutional arrangements, which gives them the right to make independent choices of management model. After the reform, magnificent changes have taken place in the structure level of forest management model in collective forest area. Based on the survey data collected from 462 farmer households in Sanming, the pilot site of reform, this pa per uses one-way ANOVA model to analyze the difference of forest farmers' satisfaction with collective forest tenure reform in different management models and its causes. The study finds that on the significance level of 0.1, the order of satisfaction with current reform policy is: the order is: village collective management, village group collective management〈single farmer household management〈joint farmer households management.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.16