检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张爱建[1] 萧芝松[1] 冯波[1] 杨银桂[1] 肖玉坤[1] 郑宝寿[1] 杨立[1] 文贵成[1]
机构地区:[1]大理学院附属医院泌尿外科,云南大理671000
出 处:《西部医学》2015年第1期83-84,共2页Medical Journal of West China
摘 要:目的 探讨经皮肾镜碎石取石术(percutaneous nephrolithotomy,PCNL)治疗上尿路结石(upper urinary tract calculus,UUTC)术后留置单J管取代双J管及肾造瘘管的安全性及有效性.方法 分析19例UUTC患者的临床资料,观察PCNL术后留置单J管取代双J管及肾造瘘的安全性和有效性.结果 19例IUUTC患者中14例术后(74.0%)结石清除干净,4例(21.0%)残留无意义结石(结石直径<0.4cm),1例(5.0%)结石残留术后行体外冲击波碎石,排出结石.术后保持单J管引流通畅,均未出现重症感染、漏尿、大出血等严重并发症,术后3~4天均拔出单J管出院.随访1~3个月,无漏尿或迟发性出血病例.结论 对于体积小的上尿路结石,PCNL术后留置单J管作为输尿管支架管是安全有效的.Objective To evaluate the feasibility and clinic safety of replacing Double-J stent and nephrostomy tube with a single-J stent in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) treated upper urinary tract calculus(UUTC). Methods A retrospective study was done in 19 patients underwent PCNL for UUTC. The average amount of stones were 1-3 and the average diameter of stones about 2.4cm ( 1.6cm to 3.2cm). All cases had hydronephrosis. We replaced Double-J stent and nephrostomy tube with a single-J stent in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Results There were 14 cases (74%) with completed stone clearance, 4 cases (21%) with no clinical significance stones (calculi diameter 〈~0.4cm) and 1 patient (5%) with residual stone. All were dislodged single-J stent after 3 to 4 days without infection or other complications. During 1 to 3 months follow-up, no hydronepherosis, calculus or ureteral obstruction was shown in all pa- tients by urtrasonography or KUB+IVP. Conclusion For the small size of upper urinary tract calculi, replacing Double- J stent and nephrostomy tube with a single-J stent in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) are technically feasible and viable option.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229