西南山区矿业城市生态基础设施综合评价  

Synthetic assessment of ecological infrastruture on mining cities of the southwest mountainous area in China

作　　者：秦趣[1,2] 陈志霞[1] 杨洪[1] 

机构地区：[1]六盘水师范学院环境与资源科学系,贵州六盘水553004 [2]乌蒙山区发展研究院,贵州六盘水553004

出　　处：《西北师范大学学报（自然科学版）》2015年第1期103-107,共5页Journal of Northwest Normal University(Natural Science)

基　　金：贵州省科学技术基金资助项目(黔科合J字[2012]2308号);贵州省教育厅高校人文社会科学研究项目(13GH003);贵州省哲学社会科学规划资助课题(13GZYB27);六盘水师范学院科研计划项目(lpssy201109)

摘　　要：针对矿业城市生态基础设施特点,以大气系统、绿地系统和水文系统为依据,建立了3个层次15项具体指标的指标体系,并运用层次分析法和综合指数法构建评价模型,对我国西南山区8个矿业城市的生态基础设施进行评价.结果表明,攀枝花生态基础设施属于较好等级,福泉、开阳、绵竹、江津、南川、个旧属于一般等级,六盘水属于较差等级,说明我国西南山区矿业城市生态基础设施水平总体不容乐观.The evaluation indexes system was established on the basis of air system ,greenbelt system and water system from the mining town of the ecological infrastructure characteristics , which includes 3 hierarchies and 15 concrete items . Analytic hierarchy process （AHP） and the method of comprehensive index evaluation are applied to establish the evaluati miodel . T hen , it studied the quality and evolvement characteristic of ecological infrastructure in the case of eight on mining cities of the suthwest muntainous aea in China . Finally , it draw s a conclusion the quality of ecological infrastructure of Panzhihua remained with better grade ;Fuquan , Kaiyang , Mianzhu , Jiangjing , Nanchuang and Gejiu belonged to common grade;Liupanshui remained with poor grade , w hich indicates that overall ecological infrastructure of mning cities of the suthwest muntainous aea in China are relatively severe .

关 键 词：生态基础设施 西南山区 矿业城市 评价指标 

分 类 号：TU984[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]