检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪永伟[1] 赵荣彩[1] 常德显[1,2] 刘育楠[1] 司成[1]
机构地区:[1]信息工程大学,郑州450004 [2]中国科学院软件研究所,北京100190
出 处:《计算机科学》2014年第12期24-29,共6页Computer Science
基 金:基金项目国家高技术研究发展技术(863计划)(2012AA012704);国家973重点基础发展计划(2011CB311801)资助
摘 要:针对证据理论的Zadeh悖论问题,提出了一种基于冲突一致度与交并集动态调整的推理决策方法。首先,该方法基于对冲突度与一致度的综合考虑,引入冲突一致度的概念,并基于冲突一致度对多源证据进行折扣操作。其次,基于交并集权重的动态调整对多源证据进行融合。然后,基于最大信任做出推理决策。最后,使用MATLAB构建仿真算例来对提出的方法与典型的证据合成方法进行比较验证。实验表明,该方法切实有效,能够避免悖论问题的产生,推理结果的区分能力优于典型方法。According to the Zadeh paradox problem in current reasoning methods based on evidence theory,a combination method based on consistency conflict and intersection union dynamic adjustment was proposed.First,considering the combination of conflict and consistency,the concept of uncertainty was introduced which can be used to discount multi-source evidences.Then,new method combines multi-source evidence based on the dynamic adjustment of weight for the intersection and union.Thus,decision could be got by maximum belief.Finally,experiments in MATLAB were made to compare the validation of the proposed method with typical combination methods.Experiments show that the proposed method is effective,which can avoid generation of the paradox.The proposed method can get better results in reasoning discrimination than typical methods.
分 类 号:TP393.08[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28