检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河北医科大学第三医院检验科,石家庄市050051 [2]河北医科大学第三医院康复科,石家庄市050051 [3]河北省血液中心,130100
出 处:《实用医学杂志》2014年第24期4028-4030,共3页The Journal of Practical Medicine
基 金:河北省医学科学研究重点课题计划(编号:20130133)
摘 要:目的:了解Rh(D)阴性献血者中弱D和Del表型的分布情况。方法:对初筛Rh(D)阴性无亲缘关系献血者采用间接抗球蛋白试验检测弱D型,采用吸收放散法检测Del型。结果:在409例盐水法初筛为Rh(D)阴性无亲缘关系献血者中,检出弱D表型27例,占6.61%,Del表型61例,占14.91%,确证Rh(D)阴性321例,占78.48%。在确证Rh(D)阴性献血者中ccee占49.14%,其次是Ccee,占23.47%;弱D表型中cc Ee占4.16%,其次是Ccee,占1.71%;Del表型中Ccee占10.02%,CCee占1.71%。结论:对初筛Rh(D)阴性的献血者应采用更为敏感的试验确证是否为弱D表型或Del表型。为保障输血安全,弱D表型和Del表型献血者应作Rh D阳性看待,而作为受血者则应视为Rh D阴性。Objective To investigate the distribution of weak D and Del phenotype in unrelated blood donors with negative Rh (D). Methods Four hundred and nineRhD (-) unrelated donors were screened by the saline agglutination method. Type weak D was detected by the indirect antiglobulin test, and type Del was detected by absorb radiation method. Results In 409 RhD (-) samples, 27 cases (6.61%) of type weak D were checked out, and 61 cases (14.91%) were type Del and 321 cases (78.48%) were corroborate for RhD (-), In the confirmed RhD (-) blood donors, phenotype ccee was most (49.14 %), followed by Ccee (23.47%), People with phenotype ccEe accounted for 4.16% in type weak D, followed by Ccee (1.71%). Ccee accounted for 10.02% in type Del, and Ccee accounted for 1.71%. Conclusion RhD (-) donors screened by regular testing should adopt a more sensitive test for verifing type weak D or Del. In order to ensure the security of blood transfusion, people with type weak D and Del should be regarded as RhD positive blood donors, and the RhD negative people deemed to be recipients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222