检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学,上海200042 [2]福建省人民检察院,福建福州350013
出 处:《龙岩学院学报》2014年第6期102-106,共5页Journal of Longyan University
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"全球治理框架下中美汇率争端的法律问题研究"(10CFX078);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大攻关项目"国际金融中心法制环境研究"(2011JZD009)
摘 要:商合伙的定位,大陆法系国家一般采用公司法律制度体系化的模式,我国则选择了接近英美法系的商事主体法律制度体系化模式。在现有市场经济体制下,应当坚持将合伙企业定位为一种与公司相并列的企业组织形式,但同时也需要为合伙与公司预留转换空间。我国商法人的类型划分既不同于大陆法系,也有别于英美法系。为解决《公司法》的相关问题,建议以开放性和封闭性作为区别,重新划分公司类型,将有限责任公司并入发起设立产生的股份有限公司。When it comes to partnership, the countries of civil law generally adopt the mode of company legal system, and there is a selection of commercial subject to a legal system of Anglo American law system model in China. Under the current market economy, the Chinese government should adhere to the partnership as a parallel with the company in the form of enterprise organization, but also need to reserve space for partnership and company. The Chinese classification of providers of legal persons is not only different from the civil law,but also different from the common law. In order to solve the existing problems of the Chinese Company Law, this paper tries to advocate the reform on reclassifying the companies by open and closed types, and incorporate the companies of limited liability into the companies limited by shares.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.68