检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《泰山学院学报》2015年第1期131-138,共8页Journal of Taishan University
基 金:湖南省教育厅科学研究重点项目(14A088);湖南师范大学青年优秀人才培养计划项目(2013YX07)
摘 要:基于"CNKI"和"TEPS"数据库,对2001-2010年《旅游学刊》与《观光休闲学报》、《运动与游憩研究》、《休闲暨观光产业研究》等3种台湾旅游学术期刊载文的论文数量、作者群体、引文文献、研究内容以及研究方法等指标进行统计与对比分析。结果显示,《旅游学刊》载文数量较大,但论文作者合作度、合著率与外文文献引用率均低于台湾期刊;在研究内容上大陆倾向于宏观层面的研究,而台湾侧重微观,且比大陆研究更为深入;研究方法上大陆以定性分析为主,而台湾以定量分析以及定性与定量相结合的方法占据主导。本研究可以为促进海峡两岸旅游学科的对比整合提供借鉴基础。Based on the database of "CNKI" and "TEPS", this paper makes a comparative statistical a- nalysis of the publication information from Tourism Tribune and 3 Taiwan authoritative tourism academic jour- nals such as Journal of Tourism and Leisure Studies, Journal of Sport and Recreation, Journal of Sport, Leis- ure and Hospitality Research in the time frame of 2001 - 2010 in terms of the of research , the cooperation types among authors, research contents and methods, etc. The analysis reveals that: ( 1 ) the of research is much greater than 3 Taiwan journals, but the cooperation types among authors and cita- tions of foreign references in the Mainland are inferior to that of Taiwan ; (2) as for visual angle and content of tourism , authors in the Mainland are in favor of macro - visual studies, which is quite distinct from the microscopic studies in Taiwan, thereby the research degree in Taiwan is much deeper than that of the Ma- inland ; (3) authors in the Mainland lay particular stress on research methods of qualitative analysis which is different from quantitative analysis adopted by most tourism literature in Taiwan. Conclusions reached by this paper are of great practical significance in encouraging academic integration across the Taiwan Straits.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.52