股骨髁部角度钢板与解剖钢板治疗股骨髁部C型骨折的疗效对比  

Femoral condyles with anatomical steel plate and Angle plate treatment the curative effect of femoral condyles C type fractures

作　　者：方勤 卢勤龙 庾盛平 何山 彭伟 罗晓东 

机构地区：[1]湖南岳阳市长炼医院,414012

出　　处：《家庭心理医生》2015年第1期74-74,共1页Family Therapist

摘　　要：目的：探讨股骨髁部角度铜板与解剖钢板治疗股骨髁部c型骨折的疗效对比。方法：抽样选取80例患者将其均分为两组进行对比研究，即研究组采用解剖钢板内固定方式进行医治。而对比组采用角度钢板内固定方式进行医治。结果：数据显示：两组患者术后骨折愈合平均时间相差无几（P〉0．05）；但是术后膝关节平均活动度及石膏固定平均时间方面，研究组却明显更具优势，两组差异比较有统计学意义（P〈0．01）；研究组患者术后患肢膝功能康复优良率为87．50％（35／40），与对比组67。50％（27／40）相较，差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论：股骨髁部解剖钢板治疗股骨髁部c型骨折疗效极佳，并且术后患者的膝关节功能恢复理想，显著改善患者的生存质量，值得临床推广。Objective To study the femoral condyles with anatomical steel plate and Angle plate treatment the curative effect of femoral condyles C type fractures. Method the sampling to select 80 cases of patients were divided into two groups to compare and study, namely the team using anatomic plate internal fixation method to heal, and control group adopts the Angle steel plate internal fixation method for treatment. Results data showed： the two groups of patients with postoperative fracture healing is almost the same average amount of time （P 〉 0.05）; But postoperative knee and a plaster cast time on average, the average mobility group was more obvious superiority, compare of differences between the two groups was statistically significant （P 〈 0.01）; Group the patients＇ limb knee function recovery was 87.50% （35140）, compared with control group 67.50% （27/40）, the difference was statistically significant （P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion femoral condyles femoral condyles of type C fractures treated by anatomical plate excellent curative effect, and recovery of knee joint function in patients with ideal, significantly improve the patient＇s quality of life, worth clinical promotion.

关 键 词：股骨髁部 C型骨折 解剖钢板 角度钢板 

分 类 号：R274.1[医药卫生—中医骨伤科学]