检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:施春梅[1] 周嫣[1] 方邦骞 欧晓丽[1] 谢庆玲[3] 钟秀芬[1]
机构地区:[1]广西壮族自治区人民医院口腔科,南宁市530021 [2]广西隆安县人民医院儿科,隆安县532700 [3]广西壮族自治区人民医院儿科,南宁市530021
出 处:《广西医学》2014年第12期1741-1743,共3页Guangxi Medical Journal
基 金:广西自然科学基金资助项目(2011GXNSFA018252)
摘 要:目的评价口腔局部治疗对儿童手足口病口腔疼痛症状的控制效果。方法手足口病患儿60例随机分为观察组和对照组各30例。两组均采取相同的全身治疗方案,观察组采用口腔局部干预方法,对照组则未应用。采用儿童疼痛评价行为量表(FLACC量表)对患儿病情进行评分直至痊愈。结果观察组病程为(7.10±1.35)d,短于对照组的(9.77±1.41)d(P<0.05)。观察组经口腔局部干预疼痛分值呈递减趋势,而对照组曲线较平缓且长。结论口腔局部干预措施方法简便,可使手足口病患儿口腔疼痛状况明显减轻,缩短了病程。Objective To evaluate the effect of oral local intervention on pain control in children with hand,foot and mouth disease. Methods Sixty children with hand,foot and mouth disease were randomly divided into observation group and control group,with 30 cases in each group. Both groups were given the same systemic treatment. Oral local intervention was only used in the observation group. The children behavior scale( FLACC scale) was applied to the assessment of children with hand,foot and mouth disease until they gained their recovery. Results The disease duration of observation group,which lasted for( 7. 10 ± 1. 35) days,was shorter than that of control group( P〈0. 05),which lasted for( 9. 77 ± 1. 41) days. The observation group treated with oral local intervention showed a decreasing pain score,while the curve of control group was gentle and long. Conclusion Oral local intervention is a simple and effective method for the oral pain control in hand,foot and mouth disease children,with a shorter disease duration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222