检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王仰文[1]
出 处:《山东科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第6期25-29,共5页Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社科基金项目"制度禀赋视角下的政府规制政策选择与治理结构研究"(10CJL045);山东省高等学校青年骨干教师国内访问学者项目经费资助
摘 要:我国关于行政决策责任的国家立法和党内法规已将责任追究的精神深深植根于政府运作的各个层面,相关制度建设引领着责任追究体系的未来方向。但是,这一系列制度因为连带责任制度的缺失而显示出明显的不完整性,离真正意义上的责任追究还有相当距离。因此,从中国行政决策责任的重点和难点问题出发,为防止决策责任追究走过场,需要重点建设完善行政决策连带责任制度。The spirit of accountability of administrative decisions has been deeply rooted in both national legislation and the Party’s regulations and put into practice in government operations at all levels .The relevant institution building is to lead the future direc‐tion for the accountability system .However ,the accountability system is far from being accomplished because of the lack of joint liability system in its framework and its failure to fulfill the potential goal in practice .Therefore ,to prevent the accountability in administrative decision‐making from being a mere formality ,the focal concern should be given to the improvement of joint liability system of accountability ,which is the tough issue for China’s administrative decision‐making accountability .
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.237.87