民间环保组织的诉讼资格与地位比较研究——兼评新《环境保护法》第58条  

Comparative Studies on the Lawsuit Qualification and Status of Grassroots ENGOs:Concurrently on Article 58 of New Environment Protection Law

作　　者：颜运秋[1] 余彦[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南大学法学院,湖南长沙410083

出　　处：《福建江夏学院学报》2014年第6期50-59,共10页Journal of Fujian Jiangxia University

基　　金：教育部2012年度哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目(12JZD037);2014年度国家哲学社会科学基金重点项目(14AFX023);中国法学会2011年度部级法学理论研究重点课题(CLS(2011)B07);2011年度最高人民检察院检察理论研究重点课题(GJ2011B09);教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"(NCET-12-0556);中南大学"升华学者计划";2013年度湖南省软科学项目(2013ZK3001)

摘　　要：工业文明带来了经济的繁荣,也引发了日益严重的生态环境问题。民间环保组织雨后春笋般地出现,是应对生态环境问题的现实需要,也是社会治理的基本表现,还是政府环境监管的有益补充。国内外立法上对民间环保组织的诉讼资格及其与环保行政机关关系的态度宽严不一,这与各国法律文化传统及环保政策导向有关。我国新近出台的《环境保护法》第58条对民间环保组织的诉讼资格的规定过于苛刻,对如何理顺与环境行政机关的关系付诸阙如,这对环境公益诉讼的开展极为不利,有必要对该条进行深刻探讨,并做出详细解释。Industrial civilization brings about not only economic prosperity,but also more and more serious ecological environment problems.The springing up of grassroots ENGOs is a practical demand to deal with those problems,a basic performance of social management and a necessary supplement of government environmental regulation.Domestic and abroad legislative attitudes to the lawsuit qualification of the grassroots ENGOs and the relationship between grassroots ENGOs and environmental authorities differ：some are strict,some are loose,those different attitudes have to do with legal tradition and orientation of environmental policy.The regulation on lawsuit qualification of grassroots ENGOs in new environmental protection law article 58 is overstrict and barely touches straightening out relationships between grassroots ENGOs and environmental authorities,which is harmful to expansion of environmental public interest litigation.Therefore,it is necessary to give a profound discussion about Article 58 and promulgate detailed judicial interpretations.

关 键 词：民间环保组织 诉讼资格 诉讼地位 

分 类 号：D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学] D925.1[政治法律—法学]