检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李敏[1]
出 处:《武警学院学报》2014年第9期37-43,共7页Journal of the Armed Police Academy
摘 要:中国特色社会主义法律体系业已形成,军事法的部门法地位问题却再度引发热议,我国法律体系相关理论构建过程中未及解决和完善的各种理论缺陷和逻辑谬误再度显现。理论上的矛盾需要化解,在我国特殊的宪政体制已经预设了军事法体系独立地位的前提下,军事法的部门法地位应当得到普遍认同。而为了达到这一目标,我国社会主义法律体系理论的完善成为必需,对军事法部门法地位的逻辑解析成为必要。Under the background of the formation of the socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics, it be- comes a focus whether a military law has the status of a departmental law. Through the debate, the deficiencies of various theories on the theory of our legal system have emerged. It is necessary to resolve the contradiction between theories. The Constitution presupposes the independence of military power, and in this context, it is sure that the military law has the status of department law. The theory of socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics should be improved to be in consistent with the logical analysis of the status of a military law.
关 键 词:军事法 中国特色社会主义法律体系 部门法 矛盾
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3