检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶菲菲[1]
出 处:《长春工程学院学报(社会科学版)》2014年第4期33-36,共4页Journal of Changchun Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:随着乌坎事件这类以公共利益之名侵害个人利益的情况不断在民众面前上演,利益的次序被不断模糊,行政法的解释面临正当性的挑战。实践的理性要求行政执法和司法机关更多考虑社会效果,将各方面因素综合考量后对法律作出合乎中道的解释和运用,即须进行利益衡量。它对行政法解释中的价值补充、法律漏洞和狭义的法解释方法不可或缺,需要在法解释实践中得到具体应用。With the events like Ukan Event,which harm personal interests in the name of public interests,continuing to happen before the public,the order of law interests is becoming vague and the legal interpretation of administrative law is faced with the challenge of validity. Practical rationality requires the administrative enforcement and judicial authorities to think more about the social effects,and makes sober interpretation and application of law with comprehensive consideration of various factors,namely proceeds to the balancing of interests. It's integral to complement of value,legal loophole and narrow sense of legal interpretation method,which are legal methods of administrative law interpretation. It should also be applied concretely in legal interpretation practice.
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170