Effect of pricking Shenmai(申脉 BL 62) and Zhaohai(照海 KI 6) on daytime arousal of patients with chronic insomnia:a randomized controlled trial  

挑治申脉、照海穴对慢性失眠患者日间觉醒功能的影响:随机对照研究（英文）

作　　者：吴希[1] 胡慧[1] 邢佳[1] 周敏[2] 谢志勇 

机构地区：[1]北京中医药大学东方医院针灸科 [2]四川省眉山市人民医院中医科 [3]平谷区中医院推拿科

出　　处：《World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion》2014年第4期1-5,23,共6页世界针灸杂志（英文版）

基　　金：Supported by Research Fund for Young Teachers from Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

摘　　要：Objective To compare the different efficacy in treating patients with chronic insomnia by pricking,acupuncture and estazolam.Methods Sixty patients were divided into pricking group（group A）,acupuncture group（group B） and western medicine group（group C） according to the random number table,with 20 cases in each group.In group A,hook-type needles were applied on Shenmai（申脉 BL 62） and Zhaohai（照海 Kl 6） bilaterally by piercing the skin,a small amount of mucus was squeezed and subcutaneous fibers were broken;in group B,disposable acupuncture needles were applied by needling BL 62 and Kl 6 bilaterally at the depth of 0.5 cun;in group C,patients were asked to take 1 mg estazolam once a day at bedtime.The three groups were observed for 28 days,and Epworth scores and improvement of symptoms in daytime dysfunction were recorded.Results The total effective rate of improvement of symptoms in daytime dysfunction of group A（100%,20/20） was superior to that of group B（70%,14/20）,and the differences were statistically significant（P〈0.05）;the total effective rates of group A and group B were superior to that of group C（25%,5/20）,and the differences were statistically significant（P〈0.01,P〈0.05）.In terms of Epworth scores,the efficacy of group A was significantly superior to that of group B（13.35±2.85 vs 11.10±3.88,P〈0.05）,the efficacy of group A was superior to that of group C（13.35±2.85 vs 5.30±3.28,P〈0.01）,and the efficacy of group B was superior to that of group C（11.10±3.88 vs 5.30±3.28,P〈0.01）.Epworth scores significantly decreased in each group after treatment（P〈0.01）.Conclusion The therapy of pricking BL 62 and Kl 6 for patients of chronic insomnia was effective,daytime sleepiness was relieved and daytime dysfunctions were improved,and the therapy was superior to estazolam,and more advantageous than acupuncture.目的:比较挑治、针刺与艾司唑仑治疗慢性失眠的疗效差异。方法:60例患者按照随机数字表法随机分为挑治组、针刺组和西药组,每组20例。挑治组采用钩型手工挑治针在双侧申脉照海穴刺破皮肤挤出少量黏液并挑断皮下纤维,每周一次;针刺组用一次性针灸针在双侧申脉照海直刺0.5寸,每日一次;药物组采用口服艾司唑仑,每日睡前一次口服1 mg。以上3组均观察28 d。记录各组Epworth量表评分及日间功能障碍症状改善情况。结果:日间功能障碍症状改善总有效率比较,挑治组(100%,20/20)优于针刺组(70%,14/20),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),挑治组及针刺组均优于西药组(25%,5/20),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01,P<0.05)。Epworth量表评分方面,挑治组疗效显著优于针刺组(13.35±2.85 vs 11.10±3.88,P<0.05),挑治组疗效优于西药组(13.35±2.85 vs 5.30±3.28,P<0.01),针刺组优于西药组(11.10±3.88 vs 5.30±3.28,P<0.01)。各组治疗后Epworth量表评分均显著降低(P<0.01)。结论:挑治申脉照海穴治疗慢性失眠有良好的疗效,可以有效减轻患者日间嗜睡程度,改善日间功能障碍,优于西药艾司唑仑,较针刺治疗亦有优势。

关 键 词：pricking chronic insomnia Shenmai（申脉 BL 62） Zhaohai（照海 KI 6） randomized controlled trial 

分 类 号：R246.6[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]