对一惩治贪污罪案例的解读与思考  

Interpretation and Thinking of the Trial of A Embezzlement Case

作　　者：刘海渤[1] 刘东渤[2] 

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨学院政法学院,哈尔滨150080 [2]福建警察学院,福州850007

出　　处：《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》2014年第5期51-54,共4页Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law

基　　金：黑龙江省社会科学研究规划项目的部分研究成果(08E045)

摘　　要：贪污罪在西方和发达国家的刑法中不是必设罪名,有的国家把它写在财产罪里,作为侵占罪或者盗窃罪加以规定,有的国家把它作为侵占、贿赂等犯罪的概括性罪名。由于美国的法律渊源复杂,尤其判例法制度决定了法官拥有较大的审判自由裁量权,加之美国其他刑罚和刑事诉讼制度的特点,使该案法官得以作出非常规判决。该判决凸显代表当代刑罚改革潮流的诸多刑罚观念和司法理念,对完善我国惩治贪污罪的刑罚制度具有一定的启示与借鉴意义。The charge of embezzlement is not specially setting up in the criminal law of the west and developed countries. The law of some countries for this crime prescribes the corresponding punishment as misappropriation or theft under public property crimes, while that of others as what has been generalized as misappropriation, bribery and other criminal charges. The paper aims to present the U.S. criminal law and judicial system from a comparative perspective based on a particular case which happened in the U. S. The complexity of the laws of the United States with its special case law system, which gives the judges a large discretion, as well as other distinctive penal and criminal case systems, contributed to an unconventional final judgment on this case. It highlights many penal concepts and judicial philosophies representative of the contemporary trend of penal reform in the U.S. Significantly, it is also of some inspiration and reference to the improvement of penalties of embezzlement in our penal system.

关 键 词：贪污罪 美国刑罚制度 司法理念 

分 类 号：DF625[政治法律—刑法学]