检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所,北京100190 [2]中国科学技术发展战略研究院科技体制与管理研究所,北京100038
出 处:《科学学研究》2014年第7期1081-1089,共9页Studies in Science of Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(71103174)
摘 要:公立科研机构在中国国家创新系统中发挥着骨干引领的作用。然而,有关这类主体面向产学研合作的能力研究却一直空白。在融合技术创新、联盟能力以及组织设计等相关理论的基础之上,提出科研机构协同创新能力这一概念,并就协同创新能力内部构成与其绩效之间的关系以及技术转移办公室(TTO)对二者关系的调节作用等提出假设。文中以中国101家公立研究院所为样本展开假设检验,研究发现,当前中国科研机构的合作主动性和关系治理能力对创新社会资本有显著正效应,但其内部协调能力却不利于创新社会资本发展;TTO的设立亦未能显著正向调节内部协调能力与创新社会资本之间的关系。针对科研机构的内部协调困境,论文重点探讨了源于科技管理体制的制约,并对未来研究方向提出建议。Public research institutes play a key leading role in Chinese innovation system. However, few research pay attention to innovation capability building of these entities. Based on the related theories of technology innovation, alliance capability and organization design etc. , this paper developed the concept of collaborative innovation capability of academic research institutions, and put forward hypotheses on the relationships between the constructions of collaborative innovation capability and its performance - innovation social capital, and the moderating functions of Technology Transfer Office on the relationships. The authors constructed a research sample by collecting data from 101 domestic public research institutes to do hypotheses testing, and found that internal coordination is negative to innovation social capital while TTO failed to positively moderate this relationship. For the current internal coordination barriers of public research institutes, the paper mainly discussed the constraints derived from the administrative system of science and technology, and suggested research directions for the future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13