检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国当代医药》2015年第2期101-102,105,共3页China Modern Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨细菌溶解物和肺炎疫苗在预防老年人肺部感染中的作用。方法选取2013年10月15日~2014年10月15日四个干休所患者,随机分为3组,细菌溶解物组给予细菌溶解物舌下滴入,肺炎疫苗组给予23价肺炎球菌多糖疫苗单次肌内注射,对照组未给予干预措施。比较3组的肺部感染发病率及住院天数。结果细菌溶解物组肺部感染发病率高于肺炎疫苗组,住院天数少于肺炎疫苗组,但两组间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);两组肺部感染发病率明显低于对照组,住院天数明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。结论细菌溶解物和肺炎疫苗均在预防肺部感染方面有明显疗效。Objective To explore the efficiency of bacterial extracts and pneumonic vaccine in prevention of respiratory infections. Methods Patients in four retired cadres from October 15,2013 to October 15,2014 were divided into three groups,bacterial extracts group with 218 cases were given with bacterial extracts,pneumonia vaccine group with 96 cas-es were given with 23-valent Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine,control group with 72 cases were not given any in-tervention.The incidence of respiratory infection and hospital days of the three groups was compared. Results The inci-dence of respiratory infection in bacterial extracts group was higher than that of pneumonia vaccine group,hospital days was shorter than that of pneumonia vaccine group,but the difference was not significant(P〉0.05);The incidence of respi-ratory infection in the bacterial extracts group and pneumonia vaccine group was lower than that of control group,hospi-tal days was shorter than that of control group,the difference was significant (P〈0.01). Conclusion Bacterial extracts and pneumonic vaccine are potentially effective approaches in preventing respiratory infections.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28