不同手术方法治疗急性胃穿孔的临床疗效对比分析  

Different Operation Method in the Treatment of Clinical Curative Effect Contrast Analysis of Acute Gastric Perforation

作　　者：陶崇翥[1] 刘彦[1] 任忠芳[1] 

机构地区：[1]辽宁抚顺矿务局总医院普外二科,113008

出　　处：《中国继续医学教育》2015年第2期80-81,共2页China Continuing Medical Education

摘　　要：目的比较急性胃穿孔在不同的手术方法治疗的临床疗效。方法将我院98例急性胃穿孔患者随机分为胃大部分切除术组(A组)和单纯修补术组(B组),对两组患者手术及术后效果进行对比分析。结果 B组在手术及住院时间少于A组,患者术后疼痛少,但是B组复发情况相对A组高,经比较治疗效果差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论医生应根据患者实际情况选择采用合适的手术方法,以提高患者满意度和生存质量。Objective Comparison of acute gastric perforation in the clinical curative effect of different surgical treatment. Methods Our hospital 98 cases of acute gastric perforation patients were randomly divided into the most gastric resection group （group A） and simple repair group （group B）, the two groups of patients with surgery and postoperative effect were analyzed. Results Group B in surgery and hospitalization time less than group A, patients with less postoperative pain, but group B relapse group A relatively tall, therapeutic effects were compared difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Physicians should be used according to the actual circumstance of patients to choose appropriate surgical method, in order to improve patient satisfaction and quality of life.

关 键 词：胃大部分切除术 单纯修补术 急性胃穿孔 临床疗效 

分 类 号：R459[医药卫生—治疗学]