检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵丽涛[1]
出 处:《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第1期63-68,共6页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大资助项目(12&ZD008)
摘 要:人们对社会信任困境的讨论多半从传统道德弱化或制度信任缺失入手。这固然有其合理之处,但问题在于:如果只是局限于此,却忽视信任困境发生的社会转型背景,那么就难以对信任困境有正确认知。就当前而言,无论是怀疑或不信任情绪,还是信任的功利化与污名化现象,抑或是信任修复困境,都与深度转型中不确定性的市场交往环境、"资本逻辑"诱导,以及道义型信任模式与制度型信任模式的脱节相关。因而,破解社会信任困境也需立足于深度转型实践,提高失信成本,完善市场运行机制,夯实信任的道德基础与制度基础,从而建构中国特色的信任模式。Most discussions on social trust dilemma are from the perspective of traditional moral weakening or trust lack within a social system. They hold true to some extent but the problem is that being confined to such perspectives and ignoring trust dilemma in the background of social transformation will make it difficult to have a correct understanding of trust dilemma. At present, doubt or mistrust, trust utilitarianism or stigmatization, or trust repair predicament are related to the uncertain environment of market communication, the induction of "capital logic" and the disjunction of moral trust model and institutional trust model in the context of deep transformation. Therefore, to crack the dilemma of social trust, the in-depth transformation should be implemented, the cost of breaking trust should be raised, the market operating mechanism should be improved, and the moral as well as institutional foundations of trust should be strengthened so as to construct the trust model with Chinese characteristics.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43