法治与法律拜物教——马克思主义对自由主义法治观的批判  

Rule of Law and Legal Fetishism——A Critique on the Rule of Law of Liberalism from the Marxist Theory

作　　者：陈林林[1] 兰婷婷[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学光华法学院,教授博士生导师杭州310008

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2015年第1期37-42,157,共6页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：浙江大学马克思主义工程研究项目"马克思主义法律理论及其中国化研究"

摘　　要：自由主义理论以拜物教的姿态对待法律和法治,从而未能揭示法的阶级性这一本质,也未能回答关于法的价值的问题。与法律拜物教相反,马克思将法律界定为取决于经济基础或社会发展的上层建筑,法律仅仅是国家的一个功能性组成部分。西方马克思主义从三个方面批评了自由主义法治,指出其背后持有一种典型的法律拜物教观念。通过对自由主义法治的拆解、祛魅,马克思主义法律理论凸显了那些被人们所忽略或边缘化的政治、法律问题的重要性。尽管自由主义法治并未消亡,并且有可能成功转型为福利国家,但这并不能证明马克思主义法律理论是失败的。后者在今日所面对的任务,不是告别或转型,而是理论创新。The attitude of libertarian theory towards law and the rule of law is fetishism. Thus the theory failed to reveal that the natural of law is essence of the classes,also it never answered the questions about the value of law. In contrast with the legal fetishism,Marx defined law as superstructure which depends on the economic foundation and social development. According to Marx,law is only a functional part of the country. The critique on the rule of law of liberalism came from Western Marxism focusing on three aspects,which pointed out that it holds the idea of legal fetishism. Through the dismantlement and disenchantment of the liberalism rule of law,the Marxist theory of law gives prominence to issues of politics and law,which had already been marginalized and ignored by people for a long time. Even though the rule of law of liberalism is not dead,and it is likely to transform into the State Welfare successfully. But it does can not prove the failure of the Marxist theory of law. Nowadays,the mission of the later is to explore theoretical innovation instead of flinching or restructuring.

关 键 词：马克思主义 自由主义 法治 法律拜物教 

分 类 号：A811[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学] D90[政治法律—法学理论]