检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马忠才[1]
机构地区:[1]西北民族大学民族学与社会学学院
出 处:《社会学评论》2015年第1期59-66,共8页Sociological Review of China
基 金:国家哲学社会科学基金项目"西北民族地区的社会分化与和谐发展研究"(08XMZ011);国家民委民族问题研究项目"西部劳动力市场民族分层研究"(2014GM088)
摘 要:基于2010年西部社会经济变迁调查数据,研究发现:(1)少数民族因户籍、学历、就业部门等因素分化为若干个亚群,而且每个亚群在劳动力市场上的境遇并不一致;(2)少数民族和汉族在就业上存在一定程度的部门隔离,高达69.7%的少数民族从事农业,而汉族农业人口的比重仅为38.7%;(3)在收入上,少数民族总体上处于劣势,但将就业部分细分后发现,民族间的收入差距在国有部门(党政/事业/国有企业)内部微乎其微,而在私营部门却仍然显著;(4)在党政机关和事业单位进入上,少数民族略有优势,而在非农部门、国有企业进入上,汉族有较大的优势。研究结论认为,少数民族和汉族在劳动力市场上的分层主要由城乡差异、学历差别、部门隔离等因素所致,民族不平等(净差异)仅仅存在于私有部门,原因是优惠政策在政府管控的国有部门仍然发生作用,但在市场化程度较高的部门力有未逮。Previous research on stratification in China has rarely paid attention to the circumstances of ethnic minorities in a rapidly changing society. In order to remedy such omission, this paper analyzes in- equality between I-Ian Chinese and ethnic minorities based on survey conducted in the west of China in 2010. The results show that the minorities are not a monolithic block but a differentiated group, however, a considerable part of minorities is still in similar socioeconomic status. The income attainment models have revealed the following findings:(1)The ethnic income gap can mainly be explained by education, urban-ru- ral geographic disparities, and sector segregation; (2)Han-minority earnings gap was negligible in govern- ment or institutions, but it increased with the marketization of the employment sector. Results also show that Han Chinese has more opportunities to get non-agricultural occupations than ethnic minorities, and ethnic minorities are more likely to work in government or institutions than Han Chinese.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117