检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄永斌[1,2] 王军起[3] 刘兆飞[1,2] 黄金辉[1,2] 张再高[4]
机构地区:[1]南京中医药大学附属连云港医院 [2]连云港市中医院泌尿外科,江苏连云港222004 [3]徐州医学院附属医院泌尿外科,江苏徐州221000 [4]连云港市东方医院泌尿外科,江苏连云港222004
出 处:《中国医疗设备》2015年第1期93-94,99,共3页China Medical Devices
摘 要:目的探讨改造后的点触式超声探针对硬结石碎石效率的影响。方法在原超声探针的前端打磨3个缺口,形成3个点状凸起,称为点触式超声探针。分别应用点触式超声探针与原超声探针对硬结石进行体外碎石,测定并比较二者的碎石速度。结果点触式超声探针的平均体外碎石速度是原超声探针的2.33倍,二者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论点触式超声探针可击碎硬结石,且碎石速度快、效率高,可为临床微创超声碎石提供参考。Objective To explore the influence of the reconstructive point-touch ultrasonic probe on the lithotripsy efficiency of tough calculus. Methods 3 gaps were grinded on the front end of the common ultrasonic probe to form 3 teeny bumps. Thus a new probe which was called point-touch ultrasonic probe was reconstructed. The vitro lithotripsy of tough calculus was conducted with the point-touch ultrasonic probe and the common ultrasonic probe, respectively. Then the lithotripsy efficiencies of the two probes were measured and compared. Results The average lithotripsy efficiency of the point-touch ultrasonic probe was 2.33 times as high as that of the common ultrasonic probe. There were significant differences between the two probes in lithotripsy efficiency(P〈0.05). Conclusion The point-touch ultrasonic probe which can break the tough calculus with fast speed and high efficiency will provide reference information for clinical minimal invasive ultrasonic lithotripsy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.215