检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]New Star Research Institute of Applied Technology, Hefei 230031, China [2]Key Laboratory of Environment Optics and Technology, Anhui Institute of Optics ~nd Fine Mechanics, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, Chin~
出 处:《Chinese Optics Letters》2014年第A02期144-148,共5页中国光学快报(英文版)
摘 要:The quantitative analysis of X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectra is studied using the partial least-squares (PLS) method. The characteristic variables of spectra matrix of PLS are optimized by genetic algorithm. The subset of multi-component characteristic spectra matrix is established which is corresponding to their concentration. The individual fitness is calculated which combines the crossover validation parameters (prediction error square summation) and correlation coefficients (R^2). The experimental result indicates that the predicated values improve using the PLS model of characteristic spectra optimization. Compared to the nonoptimized XRF spectra, the linear dependence of processed spectra averagely decreases by about 7%, root mean square error of calibration averagely increases by about 79.32, and root mean square error of cross-validation avera^elv increases by about 14.2.The quantitative analysis of X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectra is studied using the partial least-squares (PLS) method. The characteristic variables of spectra matrix of PLS are optimized by genetic algorithm. The subset of multi-component characteristic spectra matrix is established which is corresponding to their concentration. The individual fitness is calculated which combines the crossover validation parameters (prediction error square summation) and correlation coefficients (R^2). The experimental result indicates that the predicated values improve using the PLS model of characteristic spectra optimization. Compared to the nonoptimized XRF spectra, the linear dependence of processed spectra averagely decreases by about 7%, root mean square error of calibration averagely increases by about 79.32, and root mean square error of cross-validation avera^elv increases by about 14.2.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28