“类书纂辑法”与“别裁法”之辨析  

Analysis on Encyclopedia Compiling Methods and Analysis Marking

作　　者：王欣妮[1] 崔建利[2] 黄燕[1] 

机构地区：[1]聊城大学图书馆,山东聊城252059 [2]聊城大学运河学研究院,山东聊城252059

出　　处：《晋图学刊》2014年第6期51-54,共4页Shanxi Library Journal

摘　　要：类书纂辑法和别裁法在表现形式上同为摘抄征引,裁篇别出,易被混淆,实际上二者不能等同.类书重在"抄",述而不作,但类书的这种抄录往往支离破碎,不关注著录源流的意义。"别裁"作为我国古典文献著录中的主要方法之一,在裁篇别出之后往往在每个篇目之下标有子注,申明所自。同"类书的纂辑"比起来,"别裁"能够达到"旨存统要,显著专篇"的功效。Encyclopedia compiling editorship methods and analysis marking are both excerpt and citations in the form of expression so they are often easily confused. Encyclopedia focuses on ＂copy＂and narrating,but it is is often fragmented and does not care about literature sources. As a main method of China＇ s classical literature cataloging, analysis marking tends to focus on the source of each table of contents, so it may achieve the effect to keep the sys- tem aims and to highlight special articles.

关 键 词：类书 纂辑 别裁 

分 类 号：G256[文化科学—图书馆学]