检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学经济学院 [2]中国电子信息产业发展研究院
出 处:《经济与管理研究》2015年第3期54-62,共9页Research on Economics and Management
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大课题“调整区域经济结构促进国土开发空间结构优化研究”(10ZD&023);教育部哲学社会科学发展报告培育项目“中国区域经济发展报告”(13JBGP025)
摘 要:本文利用2005—2011年中国285个地级市的面板数据,实证研究了"城市病"对城市经济效率的影响。研究结果表明,中国城市产业集聚虽然能够带动城市经济效率的提升,但人口过度集中带来的拥挤效应对城市经济效率的影响显著为负,人口膨胀、交通拥堵、环境污染为主要内容的"城市病"成为制约城市经济效率提高的重要因素。从城市规模等级来看,大城市集聚经济对城市经济效率的带动作用有限,而中小城市依然能从集聚经济中获得较大收益;大城市"城市病"对城市经济效率带来的损失程度高于中小城市。Using the statistic data from 2005 to 2011 of 285 cities in China, this paper investigates the impacts of urban issues on urban economic efficiency. The result shows that the agglomeration which improves the urban economic efficiency ic efficiency. Population explosion, traffic jam and pollution are mismatch of industry and employment in China leads to , but emp the main loyment concentration restricts the urban economproblems of urban issues, also considered as the most important cause of urban economic efficiency loss. However,infrastructure is a way to expand urban capacity and iraprove urban economic efficiency. In terms of city size, the power that the agglomeration promotes city large cities is limited. In contract, agglomeration accelerates city economic efficiency in medium and economic efficiency in small cities. The carrying capacity of employment and negative impact of urban issues in large cities are higher than that of in medium and small cities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147