检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华南理工大学法学院
出 处:《学术研究》2015年第2期36-42,159,共7页Academic Research
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"宪法价值评价研究"(14BFX026)的阶段性成果
摘 要:作为宪法权利的公民检举权承载着重要的宪治功能,但其实现却遭遇层层诘难。据此,以公民检举权的实现作为问题的切入点,探寻我国检举制度的历史演变,检举制度逐步从政治运动的躯壳脱离出来走向法治化的轨道。然而囿于对检举权理论基础认识不清,检举制度的设置背离了检举权应有的宪治意涵,误入工具主义的窠臼,致使公民检举权保障制度严重缺失。在考量检举权制度的完善路径时,应重新认识检举权的宪治价值,实现从工具理性转向价值理性的指引,呼唤公民作为行使检举权的主体性地位的回归。The right of exposure is an important constitutional right, while it is difficult to realize in practice. Through reviewing institutional changes, it is found that the exposure legal system has seceded from political movement and goes toward the track of rule of law gradually. Constrained by misunderstanding of its theoretical basis, the eaccusation legal system departs from its constitutional function and strayed into instrumentalism, thereby, caus-es lack of protection system on the right of exposure. Therefore, we should value its constitutional function, ex-tricate from instrumental reason, and realize that the citizen should be regarded as the subject who share the state sovereignty and have the right to supervise government 's power.
分 类 号:D911.01[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43