论登记型与占有型动产担保物权的冲突及其消解  

On Conflicts and Solution of Registration Publicizing Chattel Security and Possessory Chattel Security

作　　者：李莉[1] 石伟[2] 

机构地区：[1]北京科技大学文法学院,讲师北京100083 [2]对外经济贸易大学国际商学院,博士后研究人员北京100029

出　　处：《学术月刊》2015年第2期93-99,共7页Academic Monthly

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究2013年一般项目"动产担保公示及其优先顺位规则研究"(13YJA820054);司法部国家法治与法学理论研究2013年中青年项目"论‘竞争中立’法律制度对我国企业国际化经营的影响及其对策"(13SFB3039)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：登记作为动产担保物权的公示方式后,担保物范围的扩大成为可能,同时却带来占有与登记公示效力冲突的问题。在承认冲突的前提下,构建清晰明确的优先顺位规则是解决冲突的必由之路。具体而言,法定担保物权优先于意定担保物权,购买价金担保权应当优先于留置权;意定担保物权之间的顺位需分情况对待,在权利同时产生的情形下,航空器、船舶、机动车等设定动产担保时,登记型担保物权优先于占有型担保物权,其余动产上设定担保时,占有型担保物权优先于登记型担保物权。Registration enlarged the scope of collateral of chattel security. Meanwhile, it brought the issue of the conflict of publicizing between possession and publicizing. Conflict is inevitable, and the solution is to construct clear and precise priority. Specifically, security interest arising from law is prior to that arising from contract; PMSI should be prior to lien; the priority between two or more security interest all arising from contracts is up to specific conditions. Under the premise of same time, when the collaterals are movables like aircrafts, watercrafts and cars, registration publicizing chattel security is superior to possessory chattel security, however, when the collaterals are other movables, the priority is reversed.

关 键 词：登记 占有 动产担保物权 公示冲突 顺位 

分 类 号：D91[政治法律—法学]