检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南开大学国际经济研究所
出 处:《亚太经济》2015年第1期82-87,共6页Asia-Pacific Economic Review
摘 要:运用增加值贸易数据,重新测度金砖国家服务贸易的国际竞争力,结果表明:增加值核算法下,金砖国家整体服务贸易出口下降,但市场占有率更高,贸易逆差也更小,服务贸易发展潜力比传统核算法下大;虽然整体服务贸易比较劣势变大(除印度比较优势更高外),但和发达国家相比,金砖国家某些细分行业仍有相当优势,因此其服务贸易发展亟需结构性调整;在传统服务业上金砖国家的竞争性较大,而现代服务业方面互补性较强。This paper used the data of value added trade, and re-measured international competitiveness of BRICS' trade in services and their sub-sectors, the results show that: on trade in value added terms, BRICS' overall services trade exports are lower, but have a higher market share, and the trade deficit is also smaller, the potential of trade in services is larger than the traditional accounting methods; although the comparative disadvantage in overall services is greater (besides India has greater advantages), compared to developed countries, some sub-sectors of services also have a considerable advantage, BRICS' services trade development needs structural adjustment; BRICS are competitive in the traditional service sectors, and are complementary in the modern service sectors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3