检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋怡欣[1]
出 处:《生态经济》2015年第2期44-49,共6页Ecological Economy
摘 要:2014年2月我国中东部地区有1.43×106 km2雾霾笼罩,其中重度雾霾区更占总面积的一半以上,可见当前雾霾治理之迫切。长期以来雾霾治理往往强调行政手段,突出的矛盾是环境保护与经济发展相互冲突。从2013年底开始,我国许多城市为治理雾霾而开展排放权交易业务,而从国际法上讲,以排放权为核心的碳金融法律制度对雾霾的治理已有20余年历史,与行政手段相比其更加注重市场的价格机制,不仅效率更高而且避免了与经济发展之间的冲突。In February of 2014, there is 1.43 ×10^6 square kilometers area blanketed by haze in the eastern part of China, and more than half of them is serious polluted, which means it is a matter of great urgency to Governance the haze. For a long time haze governance is emphasized on administrative means, but the outstanding contradiction is the conflict between environmental protection and economic development. Since the end of 2013, a lot of cities in China began to governance the haze in the way of carrying out emission rights trading business, but in the view of international law, the carbon finance whose core is emission rights with a history of twenty years governance to the haze. Compared with the administrative means, this way pays more attention to the price mechanism of the market, which can not only have greater efficiency but also avoid the conflict with the economic development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15